You have made serious allegations against someone without giving your identity therefore I can't print them. Try to find some courage somewhere and resubmit your accusations with your proper checkable ID and I will print it; that way the accused gets a chance to see who you are and respond if he/she sees fit.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Kelly, it is a matter of record that the PM has admitted his answers, to Chilcott and to Parliament, were factually incorrect.
The fact that he was already on record when I made my comments, makes your stated reasons for refusing to publish look a tad less than truthful.
Now, about Byers, Beckett, Hoon & Moran....
Still no names no pack drill eh? do you not worry about your credibility?
The fact that this was and is being treated as a non story even by the right wing media who are desperate to bring down Gordon Brown should tell even the likes of you something.
Let me give you a clue why; now think about this carefully when someone says something which is “factually incorrect” or repeats information given to them by someone else which is inaccurate does that make them a liar?
Byars, Beckett, Hoon and Moran; I saw the story on the news and their behaviour if proven to be true is terrible but : I’m almost sure that they are not unique in the House of Commons; what do you think?
Suppose that's the closest you've ever come to 'Sorry!'
Byers, Beckett, Hoon and Moran? No, I dont think teir conduct - if proven - is unique to Parliament. But, three of these were Cabinet Ministers, Labours creme de la creme.
Makes sensible people question the the judgement of the Kirkaldy Clown and his predecessor
Post a Comment