I want to thank all the people who have read my site over the past couple of years, I hope and trust that the majority found it interesting and stimulating, politics can be rough and I make no apology for going head to head with my enemies, most of them beneath me of course but I've still enjoyed most of it. It's like poking a nest of rats with a stick, and I intend to carry on.
I particularly thank those devious cretins from the reactionary right, their hate campaign against me backfired spectacularly and I won my personal vote easily, I say to them now, KEEP IT COMING. 15,000 new and returning visitors since Jan. 07 thank you. ( IT WAS MY BLOG WOT WON IT )
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
39 comments:
A grown-up would have said "I would like to thank my opponenet for a fair campaign etc..."
Standing behind a red rosette in the west of Scotland is not winning a personal mandate.
You're really deluded and sad.
Terry 15000 visitors in total, not bad for a blog. Mind you looking at the comments it seems that RFS and a few others make up the most of them.
Seems you keep getting the same crowd popping in Terry, mind you I do enjoy reading the comments.
Most amusing.
So why are you not writing about politics then? This is the second post in a row attacking the VRWC and the nth in a row of ones about the election. When are we going to hear aobut how Castro is doing?
And for the record...
Had you resigned from the Labour party and run as an independent you would have been tanked. Don't for a second think that your blog helped or ours hindered in any way. We are now formulating the plan that the monkey can be disposed of and the rosette itself will be elected in some areas of Paisley.
Well done Terry -do keep it up. I think you might be due even more new visitors shortly. I've been telling simply everyone about your blog.
btw how are the coalition talks at the council going?
jackart - when was the last time you had an original or stimulating thought ?
anon - I disagree, if it carries on this way we are looking at approx 35,000 per year. RFS and the rest of that rubbish don't make up anything like that.
anon - read my other reply to an earlier anon.
RFS - If I didn't answer your childish comments you would go back to accusing me of deleting comments etc wouldn't you.
Fidel seems to be doing OK for an eighty year old, even now I reckon he could put you and ten more like you in his back pocket and blow you all to hell.
RFS - 12.54 pm - as I said son, a bad, bad, loser.
juliette - Don't kid yourself, everyone already knows about my blog - whatever I have written I'm pleased that I have angered someone like you, your earlier post where you cynically exploit the gay community to attack me is sickening, you must be some piece of work, typical SNP by the sound of you.
I'm not involved in coalition talks the SNP who came second in the overall vote and the Lib Dems who were last are doing that, but thanks for giving me the chance to remind people of that.
Terry,
I didn't beleive that even you could be so stupid.
Have a look at your older posts say pre-Nov/Dec. Didn't you notice that virtually nobody commented on them. Then bang we are on the run up to an election and Terry's posts are receiving anywhere between 60 to 90 comments.
Don;t you realise that people have been fisking you and generally taking the p**s.
There is of course the amusement factor. I do believe that your site will remain popular as it is regularly but unintentionally hilarious.
Keep it up Terry. Many of us in the opposition would miss it dearly.
Reading it makes me go away feeling so much better about myself.
Castro would blow me to hell? So he would kill me rather than try to debate me on policy? I can see why you have a semi for the man.
IT WAS MY BLOG WOT WON IT
Too Ture Tel.... for the SNP!
Re earlier comment each reply adds another click to the stats, as this one will it means that although your audiance may be small, it is mad up of a group that are interested in this site and calling back on numerous occasions.
This is different to new vistors popping in for a visit. Use something like statcounter and breakdown the returns for more accurate results of new vistors and repeat visitors.
Oh Terry looking at the posts I would say that most of your stats are repeat vistors.
Sorry old chap.
Terry as a returning visitor you have not really won anything I pop back for a read an thats it. On occasions I have popped back two times a day.
Your stats are based on people like me and - this may come as a shock - the vast majority of stats are made up of a small group.
Its called repeat visits. Check the ip addresses on the stat breakdown and you will see that is the case.
The rest and I hate to break it to you is random hits, same as every other site.
Terry why the poor insults?
when was the last time you had an original or stimulating thought ?
RFS and the rest of that rubbish don't make up anything like that.
even now I reckon he could put you and ten more like you in his back pocket and blow you all to hell.
Come on old boy as a socialist I expect better insults than that...
"When did you have an original thought"
Well that's rich from someone who simply mouths party political slogans and half remembered marxist ideology and calls it thought.
I stand by my comment. Yours is not a personal mandate. A sack of manure would win in your area if it wore a red rosette. A point you amply demonstrate.
anon - 'insults' where do you normally go to be insulted ?
anon - 'hits' yes I know all that, I'm not an expert as I've said before, so I took some advice.
My site I'm told is very busy and way in front of most others, I can only conclude that it's because of the low lives who attack me, that and the brilliance of my writing.
anon - 'visitors' the last time I looked using 'stat counter' it was over 11,00 unique visitors in 4.5 months I'm told that that's pretty good going.
anon - 'stat counter' shows over 11,000 unique visitors in 4.5 months since January.
c'4 'who won what' I was referring to my own seat which you and the right wing cretins tried to beat me in, I won it comfortably.
In Renfrewshire the score was Labour 17 SNP 17 - I think that if you speak to someone who is numerate you will find that, that's a draw, isn't it ?
Or do you think my blog was the deciding factor in the Holyrood election ? Cretin isn't really the right word for you is it ?
RFS - are you involved with kids anywhere ?
anon - re. 'posts' this sounds rather weak, as if you don't believe it yourself.
I would have to be stupid indeed to take your word for anything so I made my own enquiries and I'm confident that you have got it wrong.
Over 11,000 unique visitors in the first 4.5 months of the year doesn't square with your view, your bias is getting in the way I think.
Just to clarify matters for the less well informed;
This is a parody site isn't it?
"are you involved with kids anywhere "
¿What the hell has that to with what I asked?
Only a minor point you need to update your links, Rayleen is no longer in power.
Would hate to give the right wing neocon zionist conspiracy a stick with which to beat you with(sic)
Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
RFS - You know the answer to that don't you. You continue to use sewer language and I will keep embarrassing you.
Would you want anyone who uses language like yours to have any contact/influence on your child ? I wouldn't. Your problem isn't it.
anon - 'links' you are obviously a smart person. I'll have to start taking you more seriously.
confused - 'parody' - what wit, what subtly, where have you been hiding ?
Terry, I would rather my child be in contact with people like me rather than people who compare their political opponents to child molesters or prostitutes simply because they have their own point of view. Or someone who advocates political violence.
You have never landed a punch on me as evidenced by the fact I am still here. In fact those with long memories will recall that you are the one running scared. Now the election is over will you debate with me? Will you even meet with me? You know where I will be.
Of course this is a parody site.
It is one of the funniest sites on the internet and Terry deserves an award for his unintentional hilarity.
The suggestion that anything that Terry says could in anyway be taken seriously is utterly preposterous.
RFS - You are a sad man - go back and read the things that you and your cronies write, and you want that kind of influence on your child, I think you are a low life but, I'm sure that you will not let your child read or hear the kind of filth that you and your mob use.
Just in case anyone is tempted to believe your lies, what I said was that if you or your odious friends applied to work with vulnerable children, based on your writings, the authorities responsible for the protection of these kids would never consider you suitable.
I never called a political opponent a prostitute that's a lie borne of desperation because you don't know where to turn, as far as political violence is concerned you're once again scraping the bottom. Was it not you who made all those threats against me ? I'm still waiting.
You and your lot set out to damage me in the election and ended up helping me, you failed miserably. I have no desire to have anything to do with you, I only indulge you in this way because I don't want to allow you to say I removed your comments, as far as knowing where to find you, well how would you go about finding me ? That's a difficult one eh ?
anon - 'parody' does this constitute an ad hominem attack ?
So you are saying that you think certain people should not work with children because of their political beliefs? Very nasty.
So you will still not debate with me? I have issued the challenge, it is up to you to respond. We all know where you live but I am not going to "stalk" you if that is what you are asking. I get my kicks out of publicly humiliating you.
RFS - OK if you want more punishment you can have it - anyone who, like you, uses the language that you use and the things you say would not be judged suitable to work with vulnerable kids. That's nothing to do with politics and claiming that it is shows how pathetic you are.
You choose to write these things and I choose to expose you for it, you are a nasty bunch, that's all, quite clearly you are not used to opposition.
Do you and your family gather to read 'devil's kitchen' together ? What a lovely scene, mum, dad, child and of course granddad and granny all chuckling at the wit and wisdom of D. K.
Did you tell your mum your latest tasteful witticism about me and Castro ? Perhaps she goes round the other ex pats showing them this filth and saying how proud she is of you.
I've told you before I would no more give credence to you than I would Nick Griffen of the BNP - We've just had a big debate which you and your kind don't have the bottle to get involved in, it's called an election.
Post a Comment