Find this guy on the blogosphere, be amazed at what he says while hiding his identity, imagine what kind of person would write stuff like this, try to picture him.
Well we might find out he has reported me to the Standards Commission which means if they decide to have a hearing we will find out his real name and even what he looks like.
I will have the added bonus of going along and demonstrating what kind of creep he is by taking with me my collection of his blog posts which are stomach churningly filthy an abusive.
I can't wait. the light is about to move from RFS and shine on this other solid citizen, gradually they are being winkled out from under their stones.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
29 comments:
I think you will find he appeared on 18DS a number of times, where he was not only happy to be named, but also happy to be identified as the writer of his blog.
Looks like that's another thing you've got completely wrong, then.
I do love the way you continue to smear those who don't have an opportunity to reply. Did you learn that trick on one of your visits to Cuba?
(Harry Haddock) 16:38
18DS ?
Happy to be named ? Why is are his details not on his blog then ?
If you read jackart and think I need to smear him what kind of a fool are you ? I’m recommending his blog to others why am I doing that ? Think hard Harry.
Dear oh dear. I was referring to you continuing to smear rfs, now he's been forced to remove his blog, because you know he can't answer back. Looks pretty cowardly to me.
You then think you can organise a similar witch hunt against Jackart but, alas, this time the facts aren't on your side ~ his name is already in the public domain, he has appeared on TV as the author of his own blog and hides nothing. There are no timid employers using threats of dismissal to save you this time.
Keep cowering.
(Harry Haddock) 17:03
Why can’t RFS answer back ?
As I said I look forward to meeting jackart. Just as a point of interest, can you slander someone who is anonymous ?
Cowardly is it ? it's not me who has been hiding all this time it's you lot.
As I've said ~ RFS can't answer back because his blog has been removed, and jackart isn't anonymous.
Who's hiding again?
(Harry Haddock) 17:11
RFS still has his blog and jackart is anonymous, stop being silly. Give me some facts, some reasoning.
Jackart's no more anonymous than the Devil's Kitchen is. Both write under pseudonyms, but both have also identified themselves - Jackart by, for example, going on 18 Doughty Street and identifying himself.
Jackart's employers have no problem with his blog, and that's really the only leverage anyone has over bloggers.
And writing about people on blogs isn't slander. It's libel. As any fule know.
Terry, forget about Jackart and RfS, the person you should be more afraid of is the blogger "Sir-C4". He was the one who made that joke about you and the McCanns, he was the one who made the video about you on You Tube and judging by his appearance on the Big Brother Auditions shows, he looks like a legitimate psycho.
See for yourself:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=J-8rP8cPa8M
I fear that you have dug your own political grave here Terry.
I think Jasper from the Herald has dug himself in deep too.
It is a pity.
I can see some legal repercussions in the pipeline and probably another visit to the standards commission for you.
You really should look to how you conduct yourself as a member of our party and I for one would move to have you disciplined.
It is unlike me to speak out in such a manner, however, you are bringing others into disgrace and I am afraid that distance must be put between your stance and those who are striving for future success.
Neil
I know what he looks like because until recently he had a link entitled "Share a flat with The Dude" which led to a site which not only included a picture of him but a reference from a friend who called him by name.
Hardly the behaviour of someone who wants to remain anonymous, is it? I've never seen any of his TV appearances, but I don't doubt that he's made them.
So he doesn't list his name and address in an 'about' section. So? That's his choice. Everyone knows who you are because you use your position to promote the idea that you might actually have something useful to say. Jackart, on the other hand, has gained regular readers because of his ideas, writing, and humour, not just because he's some councillor somewhere.
Oh, and 18DS is "18 Doughty Street". I've never seen it, but even I knew what it was.
Do try to keep up, Terry.
This is all very parochial and mind-numbingly boring. Can we please return to serious matters of high import such as, for example, whether or not His Royal Higness, the Duke of Edinburgh, once shot a tethered tiger in India? You never did offer any hard evidence in support of your accusation, Councillor, and I fear for your Knighthood!
Terry
It's just taken me about 60 seconds to find Jackart's real name
Do you really not know how to do that, or are you being disingenuous?
(Tim J) 12/06/08
Anyone who blogs under a pseudonym is anonymous as far as I’m concerned, otherwise he would have his name at the head of his blog. “pseudonym” ‘a false name especially one used by an author’ (Oxford dictionary)
(Neil) 12/06/08
I don’t believe any of this, you people are pathetic.
(Rob F) 12/06/08
See reply to (Tim J) 12/06/08
(David Duff) 12/06/08
Big Phil. Has been confronted on two occasions by fierce tied up Tigers on the first one he shot it dead like a true hero, on the second his trigger finger was injured and the other bunch of heros with him bravely shot it dead.
(Scunnered, O'Aberdein) 07:54
See reply to (Tim J) 12/06/08
(Terry Basher) 12/06/08
Do you take that seriously ? You’re a bit of a wimp aren’t you.
He wrote to me apologising for his joke about the missing child, it’s an act of course but I keep everything and if he starts to make a name for himself I would regard it as the right thing to do to expose him.
HRH Prince Philip and the tiger.
Proof Terry baby, let's have some proof.
(Macnasty) 11:07
I spent quite a considerable time arguing about this some time ago on the blog and I’m not about to go over it all again, maybe you could find the details by researching previous posts.
Kelly @ 11.18
HRH and the tiger
You provided no proof last time either, so, prove it or stop repeating it.
(Macnasty) 13:02
I don’t know about that, send it again and if I’m not going to print it I will tell you why.
How do you know what serpico has written if it was deleted ?
(Macnasty) 12:51
“ prove it or stop repeating it “
Why, What are you going to do about it ? Do you want to report me to someone as well, you are a real tough bunch aren’t you.
Anyone who blogs under a pseudonym is anonymous as far as I’m concerned, otherwise he would have his name at the head of his blog. “pseudonym” ‘a false name especially one used by an author’ (Oxford dictionary)
Right, so George Orwell was an anonymous coward, then, yes? Or does this only apply to bloggers of whom you don't approve? Are you ready to admit Jackart isn't anonymous yet? What about homosexual bloggers in Cuba who fear persecution, are they cowards as well for blogging under a pseudonym?
Double standards, Terry. Double standards. Still, at least you have admitted to Jackart that you were wrong, yet again. You must be getting quite used to it by now.
(Harry Haddock) 15:17
Utterly bizarre, I stopped typing after quoting Orwell and went to posts and there this post talking about Orwell, scary or what.
If you read my comments to (Tim J) 12/06/08 you will note that I use the phrase ’as far as I’m concerned’ that’s because people are writing to me personally using false names and I take that as being anonymous. What you might think of those names is not relevant the fact is I don’t know how to find their real names, they are anonymous to me.
I had read a lot of Orwell’s work before I actually knew his name was Eric Blair, so Eric Blair was anonymous to me. I presume he wrote as George Orwell because he wanted Eric Blair to remain anonymous.
Kelly @ 2.43
Listen up, O Sage of Renfrew.
I know what Serpico wrote because...and this is the nub....as with my comment, you published, commented and then deleted.
And as for my reporting you for your treasonable comments on the bold Philip and the tigers, I wouldn't dream of it. You provide me with to many laughs to risk having you closed down.
(Macnasty) 16:48
“as with my comment, you published, commented and then deleted”
I must have been on the gargle, either that or you are caught out again.
Kelly @ 5.12 Friday
'Caught out again' indeed.
Dream on, O plumptious one. To jog the addled Kelly memory, the thrust of my post was to query the report that the Hon Member for Glasgow Central, Mr Sarwar, was promised his son would be parachuted into his seat in return for supporting 42 days.
I thought you should know, that in the unlikely event of the report being true, Glasgow was harbouring a dynasty to rival the Windsors
(Macnasty) 14/06/08
You said.
“as with my comment, you published, commented and then deleted”
Absolute rubbish.
What report are you talking about ?
Post a Comment