What was the conversation like at the breakfast table in Buck House this morning I wonder ?
Big Phil. - “ Madge, the buggers are at again, now they want bloody bead rattlers to be Kings and Queens, bloody Catholics ! what next ? think of that Cherie bint we had round here a while ago, remember her at Balmoral she could haunt a house that one, she was a left footer and a bloody scouser to boot, awful woman just bloody awful. What’s that, daughters what ? treated equally ! hells bloody bells, daughters to succeed before sons, no offence old gel but it’s just not on, what if Margaret had been the older sister ? doesn’t bear thinking about, no no it just won’t do, can we not have the Labour Party arrested and locked away ? Could you not demand it by a Royal whatsit, a prerogative thingy and have them shot, I’d volunteer“
So after 300 years Catholics may be OK and women get a nudge forward, Jews however and Muslims and Hindus are still out, they do have some standards you know, what a farce. Madge the glove puppet, Big Phil, expert at shaking hands and insulting minorities, Charles, Andrew and Edward, the brains trust, and Anne who looks and acts like a bulldog chewing a wasp are all still considered to be superior to Any Jew, Muslim or Hindu. They are followed of course by the chuckle brothers “Winco Willie and Hooray Henry” both of whom need to use both hands to find their own a***s.
Here’s something to cheer you up, the Queen who is quoted as the richest woman in the world, wants repairs done to Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle at a cost of £16m. to be met by you and me the tax payer, doesn’t it make you proud to think that she is willing to allow ordinary people like me and you to contribute ? bless her. I have no idea what she is worth, worth is the wrong word here, better to say what she has but I know that her grandson Hooray Henry the war hero has £8M. Here are a few things paid for by you the tax payer which it was decided the Royals could not do without last year - Charles by Royal Train to visit a pub £19,000 - Charles again, same train to Edinburgh £21,460 - The Queen on a visit to the USA travelled by helicopter to the horse racing £22,849 - Prince Andrew by chartered flights £331,320 - Charles and Camilla in the Caribbean, yacht charter for 3 days £210,000 the cost of Royal travel last year ? £6.2M.
Do you ever feel that you are being taken for a fool ?
I wonder if it would be possible to allow all those who are barred from the monarchy to claim an exemption on that part of their taxes which goes to the Royals, all the Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Catholics Etc. that seems fair to me and I think I can just about remember a saying which goes “once a Catholic” I know it sounds churlish to say something like this with them being such nice folk and role models but, how many hospitals, schools Etc. could we build if we did what the Bolsheviks did all those years ago or, better still give them jobs to do and get rid of the monarchy for ever, we could catch up with the 21 St. century.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
25 comments:
Terry:
I never realised you were such a staunch monarchist. Even monarchists like myself don't believe that the royal family should be able to change the constitution on a whim. You obviously do, a real life Scotch cavalier.
Let us hope the royal family take notice of your devotion.
Roman Catholics actually have more barriers to becoming monarch then non-Christians do. I have no idea where you get your information from.
'Do what the Bolsheviks did.'
By gum Terry lad, regicide is a bit strong even for you.
Damn good job they're not coloured else the fuzz would be paying a visit to Kelly Towers
Personally, i think I'm being p****d on when Mrs Speaker takes taxis to do her shopping, something you don't seem to mind. But, there you go, it takes all kinds,
Perhaps those of us who send our children to non-denominational schools and wish our children to mix with children from othercultures and religions, should be able to claim a tax credit against the state funded, segregational, catholic only schools.
(Rumbold) 25/09/08
“I have no idea where you get your information from”
I thought I got my information from the same sources as the rest of the population e.g. Libraries, Newspapers, Magazines, Journals, TV, Radio, Internet, discussion, debate etc. etc.
I would appreciate you telling me what I’m missing, I’m always eager to learn, is there a monarchist production that I’ve missed, “The Forelock Tugger” or some such ?
(Macnasty) 25/09/08
Yes I know but, I did qualify that by suggesting giving them jobs which is of course the same thing, I’m sure the whole parasitical bunch of braying half wits would prefer mass suicide to work.
The colour of someone’s skin is never far from your thoughts is it ?
(Anonymous) 25/09/08
You get to vote for Mrs. Speaker.
(Alan) 25/09/08
Alan it doesn’t sound to me as if you want your children (god help them) to mix with Catholic children.
Scratch a monarchist and you more often than not find a sectarian bigot.
'You get to vote for Mrs Speaker.'
No I dont. I didn't even get to vote for Sad Mick becoming Mr Speaker, the Scottish Mafia did that and - allegedly - made a killing betting on his appointment.
Some rum characters in your party Terry
Terry, Your champagne socialist leader of whom you faithfully supported for years, fair racked up his own wee bill for the peasantry to swallow. and this was one trip.
"Tony Blair's final lap of world capitals before his retirement cost the taxpayer more than £700,000.
New figures show that nine trips during his last three months as Prime Minister ran up a total bill of £724,686.included five trips on European Union business, and jaunts to Tripoli to meet Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, Germany for the G8 summit, the Vatican to see the Pope, and to Washington.
The US trip, for which Mr Blair was accompanied by 18 officials, cost £319,000; the visit to Tripoli £314,000."
Anon - 1.09 pm 26 09 08
The whole house votes for the speaker and you should go to the police with your accusations, you won't because you are an anonymous coward.
(Anonymous) 15:51
You get to vote for politicians not for Royal Parasites.
"how many hospitals, schools Etc. could we build if we did what the Bolsheviks did all those years ago"
Maybe the budget could run to the funding of some gulags for when the "glorious" new regime turns paranoid and starts murdering it's own people?
Just face it Terry, communism is a failure. Maybe once you accept that, you can catch up with the 21st century too.
(God Save the Queen) 27/09/08
Judging by the last two weeks I can only conclude that you are a hermit.
Terry:
You are accusing the royal family of being racist and against particular religions. Your evidence for this is that the law governing successions is restrictive. Who controls the law? Parliament, and it is your party that currently has a majority in the Commons.
You can either call for the royal family to resume executive power and change the law, or criticise your fellow Labourites for continuing with such a law.
(Off-topic) If you want to attack the SNP, you could do a lot worse then to publicise this:
http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2410437.0.scottish_government_hires_firm_accused_of_torture_in_iraq.php
(Rumbold)
If Prince Charles were to dump Camilla or have her disappear like he did with Saint Diana and marry a Muslim, he would not succeed.
In these circumstances the Queen should abdicate, not to do so would be to support racism, in fact she is supporting racism just now by not demanding change so, I’m afraid that your beloved monarch is a sectarian racist.
Never mind the millions of innocent people that the Bolsheviks also killed, eh comrade? What are the lives of a few million peasants in the pursuit of the socialist ideal. Pity about that whole "80% of the population support the Monarchy thing" though, think how much effort it will be to purge all those racistf sectarian bigots from our glorious society.
"or have her disappear like he did with Saint Diana and marry a Muslim, he would not succeed."
You should go to the police with those accusations, right?
Foolish Communist talk.
Imagine a world where Labour never won electoral victory in 1997; a world where 50 more hospitals could have been built with the millenium dome money, a world where a freer market exists withou Labour's pathetic archaic taxes, a world where 100,000 living men would be walking the earth had they not been killed by Talibans. Imagine this better Britain where ridiculous Labour drivle never exitsted. A world where the Monarchy would be the symbol of our nation and where pathetic middle-aged Scotman didn't curl up in bed wishing they were president of the United States of Britain.
Stick your thumb back in your mouth you jealous old fart!
(Anonymous) 17:55
“Stick your thumb back in your mouth you jealous old fart! “
This sentence has given you away, you’re Prince Philip right ?
Well done, Councillor. You've managed to publicly embarrass Renfrewshire throughout the UK - I hope you're proud of yourself...
Moreover, your post would be laughable for its inaccuracies were it not rendered so disturbing by the fact that you are one of my elected representatives. Allow me to make a few points:
- Muslims, Jews and so forth are not excluded from becoming King or Queen by law; only Roman Catholics.
- The Queen is not the richest woman in the world - not by a long shot. She's not even the richest woman in Britain.
- The Queen does not own Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle. Why she should be responsible for the upkeep in your mind is beyond me.
As for your point about Royal travel, it is comparable to any head of state, and the nature of a non-executive head of state requires being a public figure making oneself available domestically and internationally.
How much would you save by abolishing the monarchy? Not a lot I should imagine, considering the full expenditure on head of state costs are paltry - and then you'll still need a head of state (with Presidencies in Germany and France, for example, costing more to administer than the British monarchy). In fact, you're making a rather obvious saving: the Queen, unlike other heads of state, performs her role for free - she does not receive a salary.
Trust me, I feel like rather more of a fool having to pay for the likes of you to govern us. I'm beginning to thank God that government is so centralised if this is an example of the standard of the average councillor.
Cheerio.
dg
“Muslims, Jews and so forth are not excluded from becoming King or Queen by law; only Roman Catholics”
That was lifted from a National Broadsheet Newspaper.
“The Queen is not the richest woman in the world”
A strange thing to say, seems rather weak, how rich is she then ? Where did she get the money ?
“The Queen does not own Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle”
Who does own it then ?
“As for your point about Royal travel, it is comparable to any head of state”
does being able to vote for heads of state not come into the argument, do you not support democracy ?
“ How much would you save by abolishing the monarchy”
The benefits would be incalculable, not being in awe of the Ruritarian farce that is the Monarchy would raise the self esteem of our people.
You should read the article again and compare it to the newspaper story and see if you can spot where the journalist has made a fool of you.
I always get the most vitriolic comments from monarchists, I have come to the conclusion that you are embarrassed by having to defend the indefensible.
The next time you see the whole braying bunch of nonentities on the palace balcony just ask yourself if you would actually employ any of them if you ran a business.
"“The Queen is not the richest woman in the world”
A strange thing to say, seems rather weak, how rich is she then ? Where did she get the money ?"
She got it the same way a lot of ordinary people get money - she inherited it.
"“The Queen does not own Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle”
Who does own it then ?"
If Britain became a republic, your president would live in Buck House.
"“As for your point about Royal travel, it is comparable to any head of state”
does being able to vote for heads of state not come into the argument, do you not support democracy ?"
Germans don't get to vote for their president either. The established parties generally rotate voting in a nonentity.
"“ How much would you save by abolishing the monarchy”
The benefits would be incalculable, not being in awe of the Ruritarian farce that is the Monarchy would raise the self esteem of our people."
Looking at Britain from the edge of the Pacific in California, I would not say that Britons suffer from lack of self-esteem. Rather the opposite, I'd say.
"I always get the most vitriolic comments from monarchists, I have come to the conclusion that you are embarrassed by having to defend the indefensible."
We're not embarrassed at all. "The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice." - G.K. Chesterton.
"The next time you see the whole braying bunch of nonentities on the palace balcony just ask yourself if you would actually employ any of them if you ran a business."
The Queen is probably the single most recognizable person on earth. Hardly a non-entity.
You seem like a nice guy and I wish you well in your political career. Don't get me wrong, socialism has features both good and bad, and so does monarchy.
(Tom in California) 17/10/08
“No taxation without representation”
The Americans were right then an it holds good now.
Arguing about how much money or homes the Monarch has is a diversion, she has wealth “beyond the dreams of avarice” none of which she earned, that is an outrage, she serves no useful purpose whatsoever.
People who are voted for get to choose the president, who like the Monarch is unnecessary.
I believe that an elected ruling government with a cabinet is the best form of rule we have we don’t need anything else, the fact that the British Royals are such a bunch of utterly useless fools compounds the felony.
The reason that the Queen is one of the most recognisable women in the world is exactly my point, why is that ? That is the point. Do you actually think it’s OK to defer to someone or salute them or look up to them because of an accident of birth ?
My respect has to be earned, you don’t get it because of your family name, if for instance Prince Philip was Mr. Joe Bloggs he would be treated with the contempt he deserves, as an ignorant arrogant parasite whose only talent is insulting minorities.
I certainly hope you will be reprimanded for this. Just a little reminder... the monarchy remains whilst it is popular with the people... it is popular with the people (80% approval latest count)
What people like about the monarchy is we don't have prattish politicians as head of state working entirely for themselves and using their own predjudice to guide their way. Monarchs are impartial and provide a great sense of continuity.
You just let your own predjudice blind you to the fact that your party is in fact a pale replica of those pesky 1980 tories. If you really are a socialist as you claim then join a party more in tune wiith your beliefs!... Or are you only with labour so you will get elected?
(Anonymous) 11:51
Monarchs are impartial and provide a great sense of continuity.
Does that include the Edward one who wanted us to join the Nazis? Or Prince Philip whose 5 sisters all married leading Nazis?
Anyone who defers to or salutes someone because of the family they were born into in my opinion is a disgrace, a serf, nothing more, someone with no dignity.
Post a Comment