Dear readers: I have just been directed to a site called (corrugated soundbite) new to me, whose raison d’être is to attack me personally: it’s just like old times: perhaps the author has just been released or something. Anyway it is not to be missed for those of you who don’t mind gazing into the minds of some people who are quite clearly manic and driven by some kind of malignant fury. The writer claims that his apparent hatred for me is political but a cursory glance shows that to be claptrap. I am going to assume that this moron is male and he has some serious problems on board, what problems and why does he have them though: that is the question. We have of course been here before and like the last time these people prefer secrecy: something which I have a problem with: not in terms of disagreeing with my point of view: I’m quite happy to argue my case with anyone. The problem is that they are the kind of people judging by what they write that you just find hard to believe: they are like wayward children in an rudeness competition trying to see who can say the ugliest thing.
I have never been able to come to terms with the fact that these things are written from a hiding place and: saint that I am I could never write a letter or comment using such language without facing the person I am attacking I just couldn’t do it: I have never written anything anonymously in my life and I don’t ever intend to: maybe it’s the way I have been brought up and it’s obviously that this is the way this writer has been brought up: I can’t help wondering and shuddering to think about the influences on someone which can turn out such utterly odious people.
The writer has a massive feeling of resentment that’s palpable but: why me? I’m sure that I have enraged and wound up plenty of folk: I’m quite pleased about that it's politics but this is not as a result of anything I’ve said. That leads me to suspect that this guy hates the Labour Party: particularly the Renfrewshire Labour Party: he seems like someone whom the party might have spurned and didn’t grasp the extent of his ambition: his ego and his state of mind. He is also a bit preoccupied with demonstrating his rather flaky intelligence the florid overstated language suggests a guy who is rather insecure and is therefore desperate to impress, all in all an nasty and quite creepy character.
I suspect that he has tried to aggravate me before and has had a go at sending me comments and hasn’t had much success arguing with me and this sleazy caper is a result of his frustration: nothing I can do about that but what he is writing would never get printed on my comments page and he is mad as hell at where he finds himself. He is not alone of course: he’s not the first and won’t be the last to be beaten up by meon the blog; perhaps he will try again at the comments: he is welcome to have a go: within the rules: meantime I would recommend a strong coffee and a dark room then an application to rejoin the human race.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
38 comments:
Tell
would you pay attention to a dog turd ??no of course not so why bother with (corrugated soundbite) and related loons.
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.
Voltaire (1694 - 1778)
Councillor:
I've just read his post myself, and if you had the intelligence to follow his links, then you'll see exactly where both yourself and he, have come to blows in the recent past. I.E. On this blog of which we communicate now.
Your views and comments over a number of Years, are utterly rancid, to anyone other than far left wing Socialist.
And why you would arrogantly pressume that he "hates particularly the Renfrewshire Labour Party" is beyond the powers of my humble abilities, because your perceived as a standing joke throughout the right wing blogosphere, as is your daughter.
Is it time to contact the Scottish press again Comrade, go running to them like a little girl? You know just like last time, but now over a differing grouping of bloggers entirely?.......
Primarily English bloggers non the less, this time around from what I can fathom out.
He's saner than you are, Terry, and he has a sense of humour which I know is a mystery to the Left.
Anyway, just thought I'd let you know, you've also had a couple of mentions on this site!
Actually, this link is better.
"...perhaps the author has just been released or something"
I don't know about that... but I have. Now where did I put that copy of photoshop?
wv: terywattch
“And why you would arrogantly pressume that he "hates particularly the Renfrewshire Labour Party" is beyond the powers of my humble abilities”
You clearly have a lot to be humble about but I find that quite interesting and I think you know why.
“but now over a differing grouping of bloggers entirely?.......”
Zat right?
“Primarily English bloggers non the less”
Mibbees aye mibbees naw eh?
Dear Terry,
It's not us
Yours aye
The Mossad
“he has a sense of humour”
I assume you appreciate the subtlety he brings to it?
I will skip the site if you don’t mind the fact that you read it etc.
see previous answer.
(Raoul Moat) 15:32
You people are just so so tough I’m more than ever confident that one or more of you might identify yourself.
(Anonymous) 18:58
Tough guys doesn’t begin to do you justice: I’m trembling.
"“he has a sense of humour”
I assume you appreciate the subtlety he brings to it?
I will skip the site if you don’t mind the fact that you read it etc.."
Yes I do appreciate it and it's not subtle at all - it doesn't have to be subtle because you provide such good feed lines! It would be churlish to ignore them.
Dear readers: I have just been directed to a site called (corrugated soundbite) new to me, whose raison d’être is to attack me personally:++
Your hubris is showing early on in this discussion; this site is not dedicated to you at all. Mind you, maybe it is just that you don't know what the term means.
it’s just like old times: perhaps the author has just been released or something.
I thought you didn't like abuse?
Anyway it is not to be missed for those of you who don’t mind gazing into the minds of some people who are quite clearly manic and driven by some kind of malignant fury. The writer claims that his apparent hatred for me is political but a cursory glance shows that to be claptrap. I am going to assume that this moron is male and he has some serious problems on board, what problems and why does he have them though: that is the question. We have of course been here before and like the last time these people prefer secrecy:
Lots of tacit abuse again. Perhaps these people prefer secrecy because of the slimy tactics you used to smear people before using your cronies in the thoroughly discredited commie party and papers. It is you, hiding behind your position, party, corrupt ideology and friends ready to smear who is the coward; if you were open and honest these people would be in the open.
You are the coward, like most socialists and communists.
something which I have a problem with: not in terms of disagreeing with my point of view: I’m quite happy to argue my case with anyone. The problem is that they are the kind of people judging by what they write that you just find hard to believe: they are like wayward children in an rudeness competition trying to see who can say the ugliest thing.
Not really, from what I've read it is latent frustration at you never allowing any dissent without abuse. As an example, you hate Thatcher and the Tories, but support and supported a regime and leader(s) who killed hundreds of thousands and maimed many more just to enhance their international standing, all because they were Labour members, they also destroyed the country fiscally. Not hardly a peep from you, even when David Milliband went to Israel on an official visit as FS, then went to visit
relatives, unofficially, in an illegal West Bank settlement...nope, not a peep. You are the coward.
I have never been able to come to terms with the fact that these things are written from a hiding place and: saint that I am I could never write a letter or comment using such language
But let's say nothing while thousands of children die by Labour ordered bombs dropped? You're the worse coward Kelly.
without facing the person I am attacking I just couldn’t do it: I have never written anything anonymously
No you get your commie friends in the press wto do it for you while crying crocodile tears.
Well i am an anonymous and I would like to condem the behaviour of "corrugated sounbite" all round. i have been watching him for a while and he is an attention seeker who is neither left or right wing but just writes what ever will cause trouble and offence and as much mayhem, or as he puts it "fun" into his comment forums as possible. In short he is a narcissist and to full of ego to be of any damage as he prides himself on creating a poisonous environment for loudmouths to mouth of in. His head is stuffed well up his own back side that is for sure
(Barking Spider) 09/07/10
I get the impression that you are more a Benny Hill/ Bob Monkhouse man than a Woody Allan/John Cleese man, that is a comfort me. Still it takes all kinds doesn’t it.
(Innocent Bystander) 09/07/10
“I thought you didn't like abuse?”
That’s correct but I will retaliate if I am abused.
Your comments on Iraq: the fiscal matter and Israel are regurgitated crap: you are beginning to sound familiar. And if I’m a coward why am I the one who is not hiding: you are probably not astute enough to see the lack of credibility there.
There are another 10/11 comments which are almost identical to this nonsense so do not intend wasting my time on them: I assume they are all from you and perhaps one of your friends: if you have any.
(Anonymous) 10/07/10
I agree but I have a feeling that all this hatred for me and the Labour Party is not because of Iraq or Blair or any other reasons cited; he has got a problem with Renfrewshire Labour; it’s quite intriguing, why pick me when he could have picked far bigger names? It doesn’t add up. Anyway he is too much of a cringing coward to id himself so I probably won’t find out.
"I get the impression that you are more a Benny Hill/ Bob Monkhouse man than a Woody Allan/John Cleese man, that is a comfort me. Still it takes all kinds doesn’t it."
Nope, completely wrong..... as usual!
Ahhh, so Niko made that comment you find so humourous - that explains why it's not funny. :-D
“Nope, completely wrong”
My apologies: it was either those two or Bernard Manning.
(Barking Spider) 15:39
I was elected before any of the other 3 candidates in my ward by a landslide, my supporters voted early and voted often. I was in the pub sipping a beer before the others were elected: you are a clown.
With reference to your last post: you should consider whether it’s fair to blame your feelings of inadequacy on me.
My "unwarranted opinion" of myself is a risk caused by dealing with complete buffoons: some targets are just too easy to hit aren’t they?
Kelly @ 5.42
'My supporters voted early and voted OFTEN?'
Before I scream 'Electoral fraud,' will you please explain the 'voted often' bit.
That’s correct but I will retaliate if I am abused.
So abuse is fine then? What if others feel they are retaliating against your offensive views?
Your comments on Iraq: the fiscal matter and Israel are regurgitated crap:
Nothing regurgitated there. This was an attempt to have you answer real questions that fly in the face of your corrupt ideology. Either answer or be proven a hypocritical coward unwilling to argue his own case.
It's a pity you couldn't allow the other posts through as they answered in some detail all your points. But you already knew that didn't you and took the opportunity to avoid the questions, answers and debate.
Hypocrite and coward peddling a defunct and corrupt message, and incapable of even arguing his pwn points.
(Byeck) 10/07/10
No, you are too stupid for words.
(Innocent Bystander) 11/07/10
“So abuse is fine then? What if others feel they are retaliating against your offensive views?”
I deal with people all the time who feel they are retaliating against my views but they don’t all find it necessary to stoop to personal abuse: are you able to grasp this?
I have written extensively on the Fiscal crisis: Iraq and Israel I don’t feel the need to go over it again: look it up on past posts.
I have no idea why you decided to write 11 lengthy banal: repetitive posts and I don’t intend to discuss it with you: I’m not a doctor.
Why don't you do some work to help the people of your district, instead of reading/writing on blogs and insulting patriots? I'm glad you don't live by me, we have enough commies ruining America.
"With reference to your last post: you should consider whether it’s fair to blame your feelings of inadequacy on me."
You presume far too much - I don't have any feelings of inadequacy and I would hazard a guess I've had a better education than you...... NEXT!
(Amusing Bunni) 15:07
I do help the people of my district: that’s why they elect me. What would an American know about politics anyway? remember Ford: Nixon: Reagan: Bush: Bush and maybe Sarah Palin next.
I watch Fox News a lot and can only conclude that Americans are the stupidest people on the planet.
(Barking Spider) 16:33
“I don't have any feelings of inadequacy”
You do and it’s very obvious to anyone who reads your remarks, perhaps you don’t realize it which is no great surprise.
Whatever education you have had has clearly been a waste of time.
We don't need no educayshun...
Which is just as well, because under Labour, we never got one.
Boo...
I deal with people all the time who feel they are retaliating against my views but they don’t all find it necessary to stoop to personal abuse: are you able to grasp this?
You resort to personal abuse all the time when someone tries to debate with you, you're tacitly doing it now by asking if I can grasp this. Just because you don't swear doesn't mean it isn't abuse. Are you able to grasp this?
I have written extensively on the Fiscal crisis: Iraq and Israel I don’t feel the need to go over it again: look it up on past posts.
I have you haven't. You have made some posts on who is to blame but always blamed others, like Thatcher, for the failings of Labour, especially London Labour. But this wasn't the point being made as well you know. The points centred around your failure to blame anything on anyone as long as they were Labour supporters, and in fact shift the blame. Read again what was written, and this is why I said you could be a hypoctite. I doubt it, but are you able to grasp this?
I have no idea why you decided to write 11 lengthy banal: repetitive posts
I didn't, there were four, all of which took each of your points and refuted them in reasonable language. The reason there were four posys, not eleven, is because there is a 4096 character limit and as I had the decency to list each point answered in italics it took the count over this.
and I don’t intend to discuss it with you: I’m not a doctor.
And there you go with the tacit abuse again. As you are,or claim to be, a public servant and are writing on a public medium I thought you wanted debate, but you don't, you want people to agree with you and nothing else. No dissent. Typical socialist.
Cowardly hypocrite afraid to debate.
(Dave Clacton) 11/07/10
Just when I thought I had gotten away with it up pops a devastating wordsmith to shoot me down, do you practice this stuff?
(Innocent Bystander) 11/07/10
“You resort to personal abuse all the time”
I have never once instigated personal abuse: you drop the personal abuse and I won’t feel obliged to retaliate OK?
“I have you haven't”
Oh yes I have! You can’t beat a good debate can you?
“I didn't, there were four”
So 3 different people decided to write 11 almost identical comments between them and they didn’t even know each other? I would bet on the horses if I were you; what a clown. Here is an example of your non abusive style.
“Lots of tacit abuse again. Perhaps these people prefer secrecy because of the slimy tactics you used to smear people before using your cronies in the thoroughly discredited commie party and papers. It is you, hiding behind your position, party, corrupt ideology and friends ready to smear who is the coward; if you were open and honest these people would be in the open.
You are the coward, like most socialists and communists”
I suppose we should be thankful that you don’t do abuse then?
“even when David Milliband went to Israel on an official visit as FS, then went to visit
relatives, unofficially, in an illegal West Bank settlement”
News to me but let me reassure you, if you source this I will write about it, is that fair enough for you? then you can apologise.
Oh dear, still ducking the issues I see and resorting to name calling to avoid answering anything.
What does it feel like having put and kept Blair in power for all those years?
BTW: The Jewish Chronicle ran the story, which was first ran by Israeli Army radio after the men escorting Milliband to the illegal West Bank settlement let the visit out of the bag.
Jewish Chronicle of 22/11/2007. Find the story yourself as it is well documented and reported. In fact, it was the first link after Googling. I'll accept your apology in your next post.
You really must try harder to avoid facing up to exactly who and what you support and keep in power. Isn't it about time you resorted to the 'well it's better than Thatcher...' defence?
(Innocent Bystander) 12:05
I think you are probably incapable of lying straight in bed at night. You accused me of ignoring the Milliband visit to the West Bank which I knew nothing about and now you want me to apologise to you. What a strange twisted character you are what you have just experienced is getting your a**e kicked, time you tried to shape up.
So now you resort to unwarranted personal abuse; I think your readers will find this strange from someone who claims never to do such things, and all because you find the discussion difficult.
let me remind you of what you said earlier in this thread: I have written extensively on the Fiscal crisis: Iraq and Israel I don’t feel the need to go over it again: look it up on past posts. You said this to me, and now you whine you didn't know about something related to the issues you claim to know so much about, and written so much about? It will take some work to regain your credibility.
This is only one of the many issues I have asked you about, and you have avoided by engaging in personal abuse.
(Innocent Bystander) 12/07/10
“So now you resort to unwarranted personal abuse”
I have never resorted to ‘unwarranted’ abuse.
Among all the millions of words written about the Middle East Conflict I didn’t know about this obscure story which was a lie anyway and you think that damages ‘my’ credibility!
“and you have avoided by engaging in personal abuse”
I have responded to personal abuse directed at me.
Kelly @ 10.36
Terry, re the 'false' story
Are you saying Milliband didn't visit family in the West Bank while on an official visit to Israel?
(Byeck) 15/07/10
The Israeli Army said he visited relatives who are West Bank Settlers and dined with them, Milliband denies this and there is no way that I could know the truth for certain so it boils down to whether I believe Milliband or the terrorist state of Israel. A difficult decision.
Post a Comment