Six days ago, Friday 24 May 2013 the Glasgow Herald carried a story headed up "Yes Scotland hail 372,000 Independence Declaration signatures"
I thought they might have been as well calling it 3,000,000 signatures for all the actual impact it had and it carried no details either, in reality it was just a rather lifeless and crude attempt at a pick up for the ever more dejected and crumbling separatist cause. My old friend Iain Lawson (more old than a friend actually) decided to have a little dig as follows. "Just a simple question how many signatures to stay in the Union has BT managed to secure so far? Now take your time now!"
Iain Lawson – 24/05/13, so far so what? I hear you ask. No change there then and not an earth shattering sequence of events OK? I stirred from my complacency brought on by years of snp/separatist/cybernat ineptitude and put pen to paper as I often do when Iain enters the fray. It's cruel I know but irresistible some times, and I sent a rather teasing post reminding Iain about the snp's phantom and rather absurd claim about large numbers of Labour people who support independence and how unreliable that claim is, there are only 3 identified as far as I'm aware at this juncture. Here is what I wrote, see what you think.
"Just wait until you see the list of Labour for independence names, there's millions of them Iain. People like you and the snp/separatist/cybernasts are going to take the crushing defeat the hardest because you are the ones who are most in denial"
44 words! Not exactly Shakespeare or Milton I admit but; believe it or not The Glasgow Herald refused to print them. Is this the kind of thing we can look forward to if Scotland chooses partition? How long will it take them to run out of books to burn? and what will they burn after the books? People be warned, voting for separation is far too high a price to pay for punctual trains.
5 comments:
Chuckles, meltdown continues.
Anonymous said...Sunday, June 02, 2013 12:39:00 am
Dear anonymous. Thank you for commenting on the Herald censorship issue. I have been getting this rather sinister treatment for some time while they print the most awful drivel from snp/separatist/cybernats who, judging by what they write need both hands to find their own arses.
I intend to periodically print some of posts which have been banned by the Herald to let people judge for themselves whether the Herald is displaying separatist snp bias, readers can decide for themselves, what's wrong with that?
Ehh... but this is already happening, isn't it? You are already being 'censored'. It's happening under the union. Does that mean that the union is bad? Maybe you should vote for separation?
Terry you do make me laugh.
Iain Lawson said...Tuesday, June 04, 2013 9:59:00 am.
Good for you Iain, lets face it there can't be many things for you to laugh at the way things are going for you and the tartan bozos in the separatist camp.
Post a Comment