tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post4377992696159664697..comments2023-05-03T08:42:38.592+00:00Comments on Councillor Terry Kelly: A CLASSIC MIGHT HAVE BEEN, AND A TRAGIC GENIUS.Cllr Terry Kellyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03285923851619030726noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-90957772966450000262008-01-25T18:53:00.000+00:002008-01-25T18:53:00.000+00:00(Cilla Battersby-Brown) 25/01/08 - No, I’m glad ...(Cilla Battersby-Brown) 25/01/08 - No, I’m glad that his torture is over.Cllr Terry Kellyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03285923851619030726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-60439731060280590512008-01-25T15:13:00.000+00:002008-01-25T15:13:00.000+00:00So who are you then that’s involved in the ‘fight’...<I><BR/>So who are you then that’s involved in the ‘fight’ <BR/></I><BR/><BR/>Is the 'fight' the same as the 'struggle'?The Incorrigible Plagiaristhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14962971938139674420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-34482366575067037322008-01-25T00:41:00.000+00:002008-01-25T00:41:00.000+00:00Your glad the guys dead -that's evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...Your glad the guys dead -that's evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<BR/><BR/>Check out my website you naughty boy!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-85313647854392465752008-01-24T16:06:00.000+00:002008-01-24T16:06:00.000+00:00(RedWing) 15:33 You seem to be jumping to conclus...(RedWing) 15:33 <BR/><BR/>You seem to be jumping to conclusions here - I’m indicating that he isn’t surely a chess ‘grandmaster’ you get grandmasters of many organisations, what were you thinking ? <BR/><BR/>“I find myself agreeing with the other person that you do our fight no good whatsoever” <BR/><BR/>So who are you then that’s involved in the ‘fight’ surely if you come away with this pompous nonsense you can at least tell me that.Cllr Terry Kellyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03285923851619030726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-71512398075228062932008-01-24T15:33:00.000+00:002008-01-24T15:33:00.000+00:00Yeah, you go Terry. Never let a chance to be a bi...Yeah, you go Terry. Never let a chance to be a bigot pass you by.<BR/><BR/>I find myself agreeing with the other person that you do our fight no good whatsoever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-1434671747682951302008-01-24T15:13:00.000+00:002008-01-24T15:13:00.000+00:00(grandmaster) 24/01/08 - There’s a touch of the ...(grandmaster) 24/01/08 - <BR/><BR/>There’s a touch of the Bobby Fischers about you I fear, and I don't mean his chess abilities. <BR/><BR/>1/correct Karpov won the world title by default, I believe he beat an old curmudgeon called Victor Korchnoi who hated him to reach the final. <BR/>Fischer done everything he could to prevent their match. At the time I thought Fischer would win but now looking back on it I’m not so sure.<BR/>2/ Kasparov V Deep Blue, correct, He was the first high profile player to go out on a limb and do this in the full glare of publicity.<BR/>3/ I assume you are right, after Kasparov. <BR/><BR/>The rest of your remarks are ignorant and show that you know as much about politics as I know about chess. Are you a ‘grandmaster’ of some lodge or other ?Cllr Terry Kellyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03285923851619030726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35177951.post-41057298841250166262008-01-24T00:12:00.000+00:002008-01-24T00:12:00.000+00:00Dearest Terry,I know that you're an autodidact, so...Dearest Terry,<BR/>I know that you're an autodidact, so here are some facts for you:<BR/><BR/>1) Fischer didn't beat Karpov for the world title - he beat Spassky (which is why there rematch in 1992 was such an event);<BR/><BR/>2) Karpov played computers like almost every grandmaster, but the multi-million pound match you refer to is surely Kasparov's against Deep Blue;<BR/><BR/>3) far from Kasparov being the only player 'game enough' to try this, I can think off the top of my head of two human v computer tournaments of real importance since then: Michael Adams v Hydra in 2006 and Vladimir Kramnik v Deep Fritz (2002 and 2006)<BR/><BR/>In short, you know as much about chess as you seem to know about anything else: which is to say, nothing.<BR/><BR/>Keep up the good work - with advocates like you, socialism remains thankfully ever more unlikelyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com