Dear reader, I have mentioned in the past that there are people out there who send me comments who have to be read to be believed.
The stuff that they send sometimes has to be binned because it's unprintable and a lot of it is poisonous.
I believe the Internet has been a gift to some poor wretches best described as inadequate, at worse sinister, and many of them 'loosely wrapped'
I often wonder if people realise just what some of them are like, well, I can now show you.
One of those described above has gone to the trouble of making a video in my honour (not) it leaves one stunned, I didn't know what to say when I watched it.
A 5 yr. old wouldn't do something like this but it looks like one has made this, it's difficult to describe how puerile it is, I urge you to see it, so you will know that I wasn't making these people up.
It has all the style and intellectual content of an SNP leaflet, these are my opponents, honest !
Find it here :- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssyuM8A6zF4
Well you could have provided a link ... but sad sacks such as myself typed the whole address in.
ReplyDeleteYou should be flatterd Terry, the work of a 5 year old perhaps but at least you are making some connection with someone who has a bit of intelligence! A bit different from your usual company in the Labour "corridors of power" I would think!
What a pity you don't possess the decorum and silent dignity of the Royal family and just let this stuff wash over you.
ReplyDeleteAlas, it's the price of fame, Councillor. As one of the keenest and most rigorous of observers north of the border you show us all the rights and wrongs, or perhaps, the Rights and Lefts, of life in contemporary Scotland, and do so in your very own unique English prose. Great minds like yours, Councillor, will always be dogged by detractors and n'er-do-wells. Ignore them, Sir, they are beneath your contempt! You must stick to your task of shining the light of Truth and Justice into the murkier waters of Hibernia in your own inimitable and truly unrepeatable style. Where would we be without it, I ask?
ReplyDeleteI quite agree. The soundtrack would have been much better with "I Hate Everything About You" by Ugly Kid Joe.
ReplyDeleteawww, did the big boy do it and run away?
ReplyDeleteI believe the Internet has been a gift to some poor wretches best described as inadequate, at worse sinister, and many of them 'loosely wrapped'
ReplyDeleteDigital Inclusion project again?
(Anonymous) 16/04/08
ReplyDeleteIt’s intelligence “but not as we know it” perhaps you do though.
(Anonymous) 16/04/08
ReplyDeleteAs far as the Royals are concerned you are confusing “decorum & silent dignity” with vacuity.
(David Duff) 16/04/08
ReplyDeleteYou are clearly a discerning observer, did you know that I can also leap tall buildings at a single bound.
Scotland is lucky to have me isn’t it.
(Serpico) 07:20
ReplyDeleteIt’s best to write something that the receiver has a remote chance of understanding.
(The Incorrigible Plagiarist) 12:09
ReplyDeleteTry looking in the mirror first.
Well I quite enjoyed the music, come on TK lighten up its just an internet jape.
ReplyDeleteAfter all you can dish it out...
I'm afraid it get's worse. Look what this clown has done.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.squidoo.com/councillorterrykelly
The content seems pretty spot on to me, so which parts do you think are untrue?
ReplyDeleteWhlst the video is somewhat short and repetitive, the comments are wholly true.
ReplyDeleteI can understand that you do not like your bigotries exposed in this way, however, you have published most of them on your own blog anyway.
Most people that read your blog know that are individual from the dark side so perhaps a video like this was not necessary.
Funny though!
(Anonymous) 17/04/08
ReplyDeleteI’m not worried about it and I don’t need to lighten up, I’m just glad that he did it.
I can now prove what some of the people who write to me are like, what’s wrong with that ?
(Wilson) 18/04/08
ReplyDeleteI already knew about this ‘clown’ I see these things as proof that I am hitting the right targets.
(Anonymous) 10:29
ReplyDeleteI’m not all that concerned about the content, I’m just happy to advertise it as typical of the people who write to me in a hostile way.
It’s riddled with lies but that’s not the point, it’s about the author, and of course people like you.
(C. Menn) 10:53
ReplyDeleteI’m reassured that the likes of you appreciate this piece ‘art’ it shows a touch of class, you are clearly someone with high standards.
macnasty - Still out of you depth I see.
ReplyDeleteThe 3rd. question allows Alex (the spiv) to have the last word which is a well prepared tirade against Labour and sings his own praises.
This prevented him from doing that, he was lost and tried to answer a question which wasn't asked, the laughter was on him allthough the lumpen nats. laughed, even they couldn't work out what had happened.
It cut the rug from him and left him trying to bluster his way through his prepared statement before being stopped.
Put it down to a learning curve.
ReplyDeleteIt cut the rug from him and left him trying to bluster his way through his prepared statement before being stopped.
Put it down to a learning curve.
Brilliant!!! once again you've shown yourself and Labour to be a cut above the rest!
Whilst you and Wendos are chortling away at the brilliance of this ploy, all those eejit political commentators like Brian Taylor are lampooning the wrong person. Alex Salmond laughing at Wendy, just shows how out of touch he is with the perfect 10 in opposition running rings around him in the name of the weak and the vulnerable once again.
Or are you joking again?
(The Incorrigible Plagiarist) 13:53
ReplyDeleteAlex (the spiv) Salmond was left blustering, trying to bully his way to announcing his prepared statement linked to a question which he wasn’t asked.
He looked pretty foolish to me but, if it was boxing, Wendy would have to knock him out to get a draw in the Scottish media at the moment.
Was he wrong footed ? You might argue over the reasons for it but, was he wrong footed ?
Kelly @ 1.38
ReplyDeleteTerry, it would have helped had you published my original post, but ne'er mind, your punters seem to have got the picture.
For those few still out of the loop, Wendy not asking a third question at F.M.Q's was a cunning plan to make Salmond look stupid.
Terry, that beats anything the sainted Baldrick ever came up with
Cllr Kelly ~1.12
ReplyDeleteSo the video is full of lies, is it?
Go on then Terry, point out the lies.
ReplyDeleteHe looked pretty foolish to me but, if it was boxing, Wendy would have to knock him out to get a draw in the Scottish media at the moment.
Interesting that you should use a boxing analogy. Quite a few commentators used boxing too. Wendy refusing to come out for the 3rd round being the most common.
Of course he was wrong footed though. Even he couldn't believe that the leader of the biggest opposition party couldn't think of 3 questions for him. It beggars belief!
I suppose, with Spielfuhrer Broon out of town, she might not have gotten all her instructions in time. Or perhaps in the week that Labour had removed the 10p tax band taking money from the least well paid to bribe the slightly better paid, she's run out of the weak and vulnerable to bleat for...
(Macnasty) 14:21
ReplyDeleteSo Wendy and her team are incapable of coming up with 3 questions.
As I’ve said before you are out of your depth in this game and you clearly know nothing about her. 3 thousand questions maybe.
(Macnasty) 14:27
ReplyDeleteThe stuff on the video has all been argued over time and time again.
(The Incorrigible Plagiarist) 14:36
ReplyDelete“Even he couldn't believe that the leader of the biggest opposition party couldn't think of 3 questions for him”
I don’t believe that he thought that for a second but, the fact that you do think that, now there’s a thing, Wendy and all her background team couldn’t come up with 3 questions.
That says rather a lot about you I’m afraid.
Kelly @ 4.29
ReplyDelete'The stuff on the video has been argued over time & time again.'
No it hasn't.
What lies were told about you on that video?
Put up or shut up,Big Man.
(Macnasty) 16:41
ReplyDelete“No it hasn't”
oh yes it has !
Kelly @ 4.50
ReplyDeleteC'mon Terry,give a steer on the video lies.
Refute them, demolish them, blast them into orbit, but please don't just leave them there to corrupt those who don't know you the way we loyal readers do.
'I can now prove what some of the people who write to me are like, what’s wrong with that ?'
ReplyDeleteEverything. As all you are doing is showing that you don't seem to have any real clue why they do it, you are proving that you have no idea what they are like.
(Scunnered, O'Aberdein) 18/04/08
ReplyDeleteI’m sure there must be a point in there somewhere, maybe you really are too clever for the rest of us.
"“No it hasn't”
ReplyDeleteoh yes it has !"
Oh No it hasn't!
ReplyDeleteWendy and all her background team couldn’t come up with 3 questions.
That says rather a lot about you I’m afraid.
Well, the clue for Wendy was in the name of the parliamentary slot...
"First Minister's questions"
It happens every Thursday.
That's when she's supposed to ask all those clever questions that must surely be buzzing around her intellectual powerhouse mind...
(The Incorrigible Plagiarist) 08:37
ReplyDeleteYour stated opinion is that Wendy and her team couldn’t think of 3 questions to ask.
I’m happy to leave that sticking there, as I said it says more about you than them.
ReplyDeleteYour stated opinion is that Wendy and her team couldn’t think of 3 questions to ask.
Not only is it my opinion, it's how it turned out. She asked 2 questions, got swatted like a fly and declined to ask a 3rd.
Are you saying that she did have a question but couldn't take any more 'punishment'?
(The Incorrigible Plagiarist) 10:35
ReplyDeleteYou keep writing it and I’ll keep printing it, it’s a doddle.
You keep writing it and I’ll keep printing it, it’s a doddle.
ReplyDeleteGreat! I like this game.
Here's a suggestion for Wendos next week:
"Does the democratically elected first Minister agree with me that the Chancellor's doubling of the lowest rate of income tax is a crass betrayal of Labour party principles?"
Hmm! Actually, perhaps she wouldn't want to give him an 'in' on Labour party and 'principles'.
(The Incorrigible Plagiarist) 21/04/08
ReplyDeleteThis looks like you have decided to stop making a fool of yourself over the 3 questions issue.
immature perhaps, but very, VERY funny.
ReplyDeleteNOW DO YOU BELIEVE ME ? HERE'S PROOF. (1) immature perhaps, but very, VERY funny. (6000) 12:10
ReplyDeleteYou are either an imbecile or a liar, it makes the observer cringe at the thought that some poor soul thought that this was clever and funny.
If it was actually funny I would not be urging people to visit it.